[Mesorah] V'kamu n'dareha

[Danny Levy]

R' Zuki,

Your first suggestion is interesting but it would need some support from
other places to show that the Mesorah sometimes forgoes the precise
division of p'sukim in favor of a more harmonious trop sequence.

I don't think that the absence of 'kol' is the reason for the r'via,
although the pashta on v'kamu would probably need to change to a munach to
allow a zakef on n'dareha.

Danny

‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 12 ביולי 2021 ב-0:19 מאת ‪Yitzchak Gottlieb‬‏ <‪
zukigottlieb at gmail.com‬‏>:‬

> Is it possible that the that the second part if the פסוק is broken up like
> the first?  (As it is in the other two.). Or that the absence of the words
> כל make it more likely not to have a זקף?
>
> Zuki
>
> --
> Yitzchak M. Gottlieb
> zukigottlieb at gmail.com
>
> On Jul 11, 2021, at 15:20, Danny Levy via Mesorah <
> mesorah at lists.aishdas.org> wrote:
>
> 
> In the first parasha of Matot there are 3 p'sukim with similar wording in
> their second halves:
> 30:5 and 30:12 - V'kamu kol n'dareha v'chol isar asher as'ra al nafshah
> yakum.
> 30:8 - V'kamu n'dareha ve'esareha asher as'ra al nafshah yakumu.
>
> In 30:5 and 30:12 the major division of the half pasuk is indicated by a
> zakef katon on n'dareha.  This is to be expected, as each of the two
> phrases has its own verb.
>
> In 30:8, however, there is a r'via on nedareha.  The major division of the
> half pasuk is not there but at the tipcha under nafshah.  This is
> surprising, as the result is that both v'kamu and yakumu refer to both
> n'dareha ve'esareha.  Two essentially identical verbs appear to be
> unnecessary.  A zakef katon on n'dareha would appear to be more logical in
> this pasuk also.
> Any explanation?
>
> Danny
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20210712/54d458a1/attachment-0005.htm>