[Mesorah] V'kamu n'dareha

[Yitzchak Gottlieb]

Is it possible that the that the second part if the פסוק is broken up like the first?  (As it is in the other two.). Or that the absence of the words כל make it more likely not to have a זקף?

Zuki

-- 
Yitzchak M. Gottlieb
zukigottlieb at gmail.com

> On Jul 11, 2021, at 15:20, Danny Levy via Mesorah <mesorah at lists.aishdas.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> In the first parasha of Matot there are 3 p'sukim with similar wording in their second halves:
> 30:5 and 30:12 - V'kamu kol n'dareha v'chol isar asher as'ra al nafshah yakum.
> 30:8 - V'kamu n'dareha ve'esareha asher as'ra al nafshah yakumu.
> 
> In 30:5 and 30:12 the major division of the half pasuk is indicated by a zakef katon on n'dareha.  This is to be expected, as each of the two phrases has its own verb.
> 
> In 30:8, however, there is a r'via on nedareha.  The major division of the half pasuk is not there but at the tipcha under nafshah.  This is surprising, as the result is that both v'kamu and yakumu refer to both n'dareha ve'esareha.  Two essentially identical verbs appear to be unnecessary.  A zakef katon on n'dareha would appear to be more logical in this pasuk also.
> Any explanation?
> 
> Danny
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20210711/6e69f8ab/attachment-0005.htm>