[Mesorah] B'nei Aharon hanotarim

[Michael Poppers via Mesorah]

​...and I believe it was RSMandel who pointed out that ​a mafsiq of a
certain "strength" has characteristics of a m'shareis when it occurs
immediately prior to a "stronger" mafsiq.

More info. from RSM et al. can be found here
<https://sites.google.com/site/torahreading/mafsiqim> (a Webpage I created
many moons ago :)).


On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Sholom Simon via Mesorah <
mesorah at lists.aishdas.org> wrote:

> Re: tipcha not being pausal:
>
> Somebody here -- I think it may have been R M Poppers? -- pointed out to
> me instances where a tipcha divided up two words in smichus form.
>
> -- Sholom
>
> At 03:37 PM 4/24/2017, Danny Levy via Mesorah wrote:
>
> Did Perlman explain why 'lemor' is often connected to the previous word
> contrary to the syntax?
>
> Indeed it appears to be the case in about half of the instances of 'lemor'
> but this one stands out as an extreme example in which the adjective is
> disconnected from the noun it describes in order to connect it to 'lemor'
> instead.
>
> Danny Levy
>
> 2017-04-23 22:08 GMT+03:00 Dov Bloom <dovbbb at gmail.com>:
> 1. I am pretty sure that the tipha on the word hanotarim is not a real
> mafsik (pausal trop) but is there because of the 2 word unit 'hanotarim
> l'amor"
> 2. Mori veRabi in the field of biblical accentuation (teamim, trop) Mechel
> Perlman wrote a lot about the way teamim treat the word l'amor. IIRC the
> word is usually conjucted to other preceeding words (as in the ubiquitous
> vaydaber Hashem el-Moshe l'amor , the mafsik on the second word conjuncts
>  {el-Moshe l'amor}  together.Â
> We would expect by syntax:{vaydaber Hashem el-Moshe} : (semicolon) Â
> l'amor. But the teamim don't do it the way we would have expected.Â
> Dov Bloom
>
> On Apr 23, 2017 9:47 PM, "Danny Levy via Mesorah" <
> mesorah at lists.aishdas.org> wrote:
> Can anybody explain or venture a guess why the Ba'alei Hamesorah fixed the
> te'amim of the second half of Vayikra 10:16 - vayiktzof al-ElazarÂ
> v'al-Itamar b'nei Aharon hanotarim lemor - to be t'lisha g'dola, mahpach,
> pashta, munach, zakef, tipcha, sof pasuk, such that 'hanotarim' is joined
> to the following 'lemor' rather than to the preceeding 'bnei Aharon'?
>
> Wouldn't t'lisha k'tana, kadma v'azla, darga, t'vir, tipcha, sof pasuk fit
> the p'shat better?
>
> Danny Levy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20170425/29333a69/attachment-0004.htm>