[Mesorah] [somewhat off-topic] ir Tziyon t'male

[R Davidovich]

Perhaps the words mirror their original form/usage in Tanach. Has someone
looked into where those terms (Binyan Hamikdash / Milui Ir Tzion) first
appear in Tanach/Chazal?
RD


On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ben Kandel <bkandel at yu.edu> wrote:

> I have a more basic question:  Why should we think that it's important for
> the author of the zemirah to have the two verbs in the same binyan,
> especially if it changes the meaning of the word?  The word "timale/t'male"
> is supposed to rhyme with na-aleh in the next line (I assume), so why
> should we think that its form would be influenced by the word "yibaneh"?
>
> Kol tuv
>
> Ben
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:37 AM, D&E-H Bannett <dbnet at zahav.net.il> wrote:
>
>> R' Mazuz's siddur "Ish Matzliach" has timalei (authorized siddur, not
>> copies).  I suspect that this is the reference that you have already
>> received from R' Hayyim Obadyah so I'm probably not adding anything.
>>
>> Both Seligmann Baer and the Mateh Yehuda (peirush on zemirot by R' Yehuda
>> Oppenheim in "Shlosha S'farim Niftahim", zemirot with peirushim) refer one
>> to Y'shayahu 33:5 where it says milei Tzion tz'daka (piel).
>>
>>
>> bivrakha,
>>
>> David
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Mesorah mailing list
>> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
>> http://lists.aishdas.org/**listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.**org<http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20111114/279b3467/attachment-0006.htm>