[Mesorah] Tenollanu?

[D&E-H Bannett]

Just to complicate things, I refer you all to Mikraot 
Gedolot Shlomo Netter 1859 aka Shoken where the Mesora on 
the page of Breshit 2:23, luk'cha-zot, states: leita, the 
lamed with meteg, kuf rafa l'hakel, and two k'matzim 
hatufim, zayin degusha midin dachik.

And now I could use a little help. Does anyone have the 
Tikkun Sofrim of Breishit by R' Shlomo Dubna (in 
Mendelssohn's chumash).  I have only a very bad photocopy 
which shows both sides of the original page at about equal 
strength and is almost impossible to read. As I no longer go 
to Bar-Ilan and don't live in a city, I have no easy access 
to a library that might have it.

After quoting various sources on the lamed and kuf and the 
meaning of dagesh, ma'arikh, meteg, and g'aya, he goes on. 
What I can make out, with some guessing, is:

v'dagesh bzayyin midin dachik ki af shehakamatz bachet hu 
kamatz gadol b'li s'mikhut, mikol makom b'hisamekh hamila 
l'achareha b'makaf yishtaneh l'kamatz chatuf.

And if the transliteration is not easily read" There is a 
dagesh in the zayyin midin dachik because, although the 
kamatz in the chet is a kamatz gadol, when it is attached to 
the following word by a meteg the kamatz changes to a kamatz 
chatuf.

I'd be overjoyed if someone can tell me if my reading of R' 
Shlomo Dubna is close to correct.
As noted before, I am not taking a side in the argument 
because I have never really tried to investigate and 
understand the different opinions. I also haven't taken 
sides on the question of the possible mix-up in the 
definitions of din dachik and ati merachik.


Anxiously awaiting to hear from someone who hasn't burned 
his Mendelssohn chumash and has the clear text.


k"t,

David