[Avodah] tzitz eliezeer.....

[hankman]

RMB wrote:

The mitzvah of chinukh could itself be the rabbinic obligation the TE
is speaking of.

CM notes:

There would seem to be a slight problem in the logic. The only reason we have to follow the chiyuvim deRabbanan is because there is a mitsvoh d’Aureisa that commands us to follow the Rabbinic mitsvot and takanot. But the ketanim are not mechuyav in any mitzvot d’Aureisa (including lo tasur yamin u’semol) so how can they be required to follow Rabbiinic commands? At best the mitsvoh of chinuch is on the father (although I have vaguely heard of some meforshim who apply to the chiyuv in some fashion to the ketanim as well). I haven’t followed this thread from the beginning so please excuse me if I have brought up something you already discussed.

Kol Tuv

Chaim Manaster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20111214/0e1f42de/attachment-0002.htm>