[Mesorah] וישלח ל"ב:י"א - קטנתי

[Danny Levy]

Breuer does not list it, which means that all the MSS and the first edition
of Mikraot Gedolot (1525) all have azla geresh.
Minchat Shai does not mention it (he rarely comments on trop).
So it seems to be a fairly recent mistake, maybe by Heidenheim.
I wonder if maybe the source of the mistake was the cholam chaser on the
tet being mistaken for a revia.

Danny

‫בתאריך יום א׳, 26 בנוב׳ 2023 ב-4:03 מאת ‪rabbirichwolpoe via Mesorah‬‏ <‪
mesorah at lists.aishdas.org‬‏>:‬

> *{יא}* קָ֜טֹ֗נְתִּי מִכֹּ֤ל הַֽחֲסָדִים֙ וּמִכָּל-הָ֣אֱמֶ֔ת אֲשֶׁ֥ר
> עָשִׂ֖יתָ אֶת-עַבְדֶּ֑ךָ כִּ֣י בְמַקְלִ֗י עָבַ֨רְתִּי֙ אֶת-הַיַּרְדֵּ֣ן
> הַזֶּ֔ה וְעַתָּ֥ה הָיִ֖יתִי לִשְׁנֵ֥י מַֽחֲנֽוֹת:
>
> Most Editions have an Azla Geieish on Katonti.
>
> Heidenheim (RWH), and a few that have been influenced by him, have a Revia.
>
> Can anyone shed some light on the nature of this dispute?
> EG
> 1 What do the manuscripts say?
> 2 What do Minchas Shai and  other Experts on Masorah say?
> Etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> RRW
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20231127/ad6e42cd/attachment-0001.htm>