[Mesorah] וישב ל"ח י"ב הוא

[Yitzhak Ajzner]

Just saying: a Zakef makes absolutely no sense at all!

This is how the 2nd half of the verse divides up (from Michael Perlman’s Humash):



Putting a zakef on “hu”, means this section splits on that word, which would make the verse incomprehensible.

 

The real question in this verse, is why is the main break in the 2nd half of the verse on HaAdulami, and not on Yehuda. Timnata modifies Va’ya’al, and has nothing to do with Va’yinahem. By putting the main break on HaAdulami, it seems like it also modifies Va’yinahem, but it doesn’t. Although it would require quite an effort, that can be explained.

 

Yitzhak

 

 

From: Mesorah <mesorah-bounces at lists.aishdas.org> On Behalf Of rabbirichwolpoe via Mesorah
Sent: Sunday, 10 December 2023 4:44 AM
To: rabbirichwolpoe <rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com>; mesorah at aishdas.org
Subject: Re: [Mesorah] וישב ל"ח י"ב הוא

 

the publisher would be first in line to tell you that this seifer is not entirely based on Heidenheim>>

 

Absolutely true

 

BUT

In my experience he is usually close to RWH

 

This specific deviation was a bit of a surprise to me

 

There are other cases where RWH might be more controversial.  But afaict not this one

 

FWIW, I did confim this morning with 1 of my Roedelheim Humashim that RWH Has a revia.

 

 

 

RRW

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20231210/d7c214c6/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 61777 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20231210/d7c214c6/attachment-0001.png>