[Mesorah] R'tzon Konam vs. Koneihem
Richard
rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com
Sat Jun 22 18:50:56 PDT 2013
Re: <<Baer Says Rambam has Konam>>
«The Baladi nusach usually follows the Rambam, and the
Teimani Tikhlal has koneihem with a yud.»
Yes I don't know how Baer got this. I think I also alluded to the apparent discrepancy re: Baer on S'phardic Siddurim which apparently do NOT have Konam.
«As has been written a few times on list, all old siddurim
have koneihem.
David»
Except:
• Baer cites Machzor Roma. I don't know how old that was.
• Eizor Eliyahi cites Siddur Cracow 338 [~1578 CE] as an exception.
• Hofmeister has Koneihem in his text, but mentions Konam in small font as (N"M). I'm not clear what this means, I would guess "Nusach Munich".
----------------------------
I will BE"H cite an Ohr HaChaim Hakkadosh I just saw today on wording T'fillah.
-----------------------------------------
“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.”
~ Leo Tolstoy
Shalom, RRW
More information about the Mesorah
mailing list