[Mesorah] She'ata / Sha'ata
D&E-H Bannett
dbnet at zahav.net.il
Wed Feb 22 05:10:45 PST 2012
Re: RRW's <<Indeed there are differing techniques WRT hataf
patach vs. Sh'va na with Heidenheim on one extreme, GRA and
R M Breuer on the other, and EG Koren in the middle
somewhere.>>
Heidenheim's hatafim are influenced by R' Yekutiel Hakohen
ben Yehuda's "'Ein Hakorei".
Koren is based mainly on Heidenheim.
R' Mordekhai Breuer has less hatafim. In this he follows the
Leningrad codex. (My feeling, without proof, is that R'
Breuer, a Yekke who heard barAkhu and hallAluya in his
youth, wanted to avoid adding to the Yekke custom of making
of a hataf patach into a full patach by removed them where
they were not in a guttural.)
The Keter itself and R' Menachem Cohen in the Bar Ilan
reconstituted Keter, have more hatafim.
What is important here is not the abundance or lack of
hatafim but the words of the accepted decision maker, R'
Aharon ben Asher. "Ein ladavar hazeh shoresh ki im birtzon
hasof'rim". As the change of a sh'va na' to a hataf does
not change the pronunciation, it has no roots. Sof'rim who
want to warn the reader that the sh'va is na', add the
patach symbol next to it. Other sof'rim don't bother. None
added it in words repeated often and that everyone knows,
e.g. the sh'va alone in shem havaya with nikkud of shem
adanut.
k"t,
David
More information about the Mesorah
mailing list