[Mesorah] Allepo Codex - Ruth 1:9

[Hayyim Obadyah]

I’m sure you’re right.  They just didn’t seem similar enough.

 

Can you suggest any secondary source on the Aleppo Codex massora that is not in L?  

 

 

From: Yisrael Dubitsky [mailto:yidubitsky at gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 12:02 PM
To: Hayyim Obadyah
Cc: mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
Subject: Re: [Mesorah] Allepo Codex - Ruth 1:9

 

Aleppo at Deut 31:21 has the same note so clearly that is the second reference...Why would you discount that?

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Hayyim Obadyah <HayyimObadyah at aol.com> wrote:

It looks to me that the Aleppo Codex gives a masora qetana not in the Leningrad Codex for WMC)N  וּמְצֶ֣אןָ of "beth haser (twice defective)".  However, I find no other occurrence of the word, with or without waw conjunctive, with or without final heh (although TMC)N  תִמְצֶ֨אןָ, also haser, occurs in Deut 31:21).  I found nothing listed for the word in Ginsburg's Massorah or Frensdorff's Massora Magna or his Ochlah W’ochlah.  

 

Am I misreading the manuscript pdf?

Hayyim

 

 


_______________________________________________
Mesorah mailing list
Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20101031/e8d52054/attachment-0006.htm>