[Mesorah] another grammar question

[Michael Hamm]

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Micha Berger <micha at aishdas.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Michael Hamm wrote:
> : Someone leining Ki Savo said (26:14) "v'lo nasati mimenu lames", with
> : an Ashkenazi kamatz (not a patach) under the lamed of "lames" instead
> : of the proper sh'va.
<snip>
> "Lameis" means "to the deceased", as opposed to the pasuq really talking
> about "to a deceased". No?

Does it?  With a kamatz?

Michael Hamm