On 6/15/2012 11:39 AM, Micha Berger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:48:31PM -0700, Harvey Benton wrote: > ... > : shita, and why? since it is not one of the 3 yaareg v' al yaavors..... ... > CH might be subsumed under AZ, though. Pardon? Why on earth would chillul Hashem be a toladah of avodah zarah? Lisa