[Avodah] There was no mechitzah at the Kotel

Rich, Joel JRich at sibson.com
Thu Jan 6 06:53:36 PST 2011


 


Others, including myself, argued that since there is no chiyuv to daven at the kotel, or for the women to be there during minyan, with all those other shuls Y-m had at the time (how far away are the four shuls of the rova?), had davening without a mechitzah been a problem, they simply wouldn't have davened there. The presence of alternative locations removes the dochaq-ness.

Tir'u baTov!
-Micha

-----------------------------------------------------
Raises an interesting (to me) question - we know there is an "inyan" of davening in a shul, even byichidut, versus davening elsewhere.(sidepoint -IIRC R'HS has said that a mechitza is required for a minyan (or makom) kavua, but not strictly required for an arai minyan)  What would the shikul hadaat be for davening in a shul alone  where the moveable mechitza is not up and there is a woman in the back far corner of the room, properly dressed and reading a tanach  vs. davening at home alone?
KT
Joel Rich
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE 
ADDRESSEE.  IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE.  Dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is 
strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us 
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.  
Thank you.




More information about the Avodah mailing list