[Avodah] ee itmar hachi itmar

[Eli Turkel]

<<That's my understanding. That they didn't take it for granted that
maamarim reached Bavel intact, and if something didn't make sense,
it was considered indication that perhaps it was repeated incorrectly.>>

The 2 cases on shabbat 44 are a statement from Zeiri and then a statement from
R. Yehuda in the name of Rav, both Babylonian amoraim.

shortly afterwards on 45a the gemara quotes a statement from R Cahana
and R. Ashi
to Rav - and I didnt see any comments on the the order of the generations

-- 
Eli Turkel