[Avodah] תשובה: aveilus of bein hamezarim on shabbos

[Shlomo Pick]

I don't know who the gedolei haposekim were in camp aguda circa 1966. but
from the posekim in the responsa literature, eg. Chasam sofer, vol. I, no
158, it's clear that the minhag of changing or not changing dress was a
communal affair and clothing was not an "individual based minhag". then
again in frankfort and other place they didn't come to shul on shabbos in
shorts, baseball hats, red pants, white blazers, sneakers, sandals without
socks, and who knows what not.
I don't have to explain every chassidische minhag, just pointed out that the
problem of aveilus bezibbur on shabbos has found some resolutions, and not
"veyesh leyashev bedochak".
Oh, last nite we also did Kiddush levanah as per minhag hagrah.
May this week of shavua she chal bo tisha b'av be incomplete and if we have
to complete it, let it be the last one.
shlomo

-----הודעה מקורית-----
מאת: rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com [mailto:rabbirichwolpoe at gmail.com] 
נשלח: Sunday, July 26, 2009 6:15 AM
אל: Shlomo Pick; Micha
נושא: Re: aveilus of bein hamezarim on shabbos


Those who are noheig aveilut should not be wearing their best shabbos finery
on Shabbat chazon, per the posekim who say so.
Shavu’a tov
Shlomo "

Lav davka

When I was @ camp agudah in 1966 they specifcally said that not changing
clothes was based upon the premise that the average Jew's Shabbos clothes
were not much different than his weekday clothes in the time of the Rema et.
Al.

Besides, rejecting the GRA's and the bal hatanya revisions does not mean we
reject any and all revisions

Also the nusach revisions are public and based upon Minhag Ashkenaz and the
clothing is individual based minhag

Therefore Apples and oranges 

As pointed out, you cannot equate one minhag with another

Leshitashcha those hassidim who adopted Sephardic practice should follow the
machaeir and no longer hold the nine days or qitniyos!


Shavua Tov
RRW
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile



__________ NOD32 4278 (20090725) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com