[Avodah] police misdeeds and trial evidence

[Zev Sero]

Moshe Y. Gluck wrote:

> I'm sorry, maybe I wasn't clear - my question was on R' Eli Turkel's
> unwritten premise that BD _does_ accept evidence aside from Shnaim Eidim.

And my answer is that it's pretty clear that forensic evidence is
admissible, but only to impeach witnesses.


-- 
Zev Sero               Something has gone seriously awry with this Court's
zev at sero.name          interpretation of the Constitution.
                       	                          - Clarence Thomas