Moshe Y. Gluck wrote: > I'm sorry, maybe I wasn't clear - my question was on R' Eli Turkel's > unwritten premise that BD _does_ accept evidence aside from Shnaim Eidim. I don't know what the practice is, but in theory BD has a lot of leeway. See HM 15:5 and the Aruch HaShulhan's additional comments in 15:4. David Riceman