[Avodah] omer - Rihal

[Arie Folger]

On Sunday, 1. June 2008 21.36:17 zviLampel at theJnet.com wrote:
> And yet, how come this
> hadn't happened in such a while?" he should have said
> “kammah sh’nay shvee’ees avru sheh-hayya chal
> yud-daled yachol lih’yos b’Shabbos, v’lamma lo chal
> yud-daled b’Shabbos,” not “ha-lo ee-efshar l’shnay
> sh’vee’ees sheh-yachol yud-daled lihyos b’Shabbos,
> v’lamma niss-almah halacha may-hen.”

Your argument is indeed very good, but I'd like to point out that there is a 
plausible difference: should vs. could. You ask, he should have asked that it 
should have fallen out of Shabbos, while he stated it should not be possibly 
not to fall out on Shabbos [and yet it did]. With these four words in square 
barckets I believe that we have fixed Rav Avun'd statement.

That said, your argument is valid indeed.

KT,
-- 
Arie Folger
http://www.ariefolger.googlepages.com