[Avodah] Torah Study vs. other contributions to soCIETY
Daniel Eidensohn
yadmoshe at 012.net.il
Fri May 18 11:53:40 PDT 2007
R' Samuel Svarc wrote:
>
>> If so, how do you justify the Rama's behavior?
>>
>
> He learned these subjects as a preparation to better understand Torah. The
> Maharshal held that these subjects are forbidden to study and the Rama
> disagreed with him. The same way, like today, there are machlokes haposikim
> on certain subjects if one is permitted to learn them, they too argued about
> this. But none of them held that one can't study permitted subjects to
> enhance Torah.
>
>
I apologize if my comments are irrelevant - I simply haven't been
following this thread.
If you are saying that the Rema studied philosophy but the Marshal held
that it was forbidden. The Rema refers to this in his respone to the
Maharshal noting that the Maharshal also knew philosophy. The dispute
seemed to be whether one can utilized secular understanding to explain
Torah issues and mix them into psak. Rema felt it was appropriate and
Maharshal felt it was not. The exchange also included the criticism that
Rema was ignorant of grammar.
Daniel Eidensohn
More information about the Avodah
mailing list