[Avodah] Clarification on Hareidi El-Al

[Arie Folger]

On Thursday, 11. January 2007 20:49, Akiva Blum wrote:
> R'Arie Folger wrote:
>  >>However, I believe that, while NJ are not metame beohel, they
>
> are metame immediately above them, so the rabbis would likely rule to avoid
> any cemetary.<<
>
> Tumah above *is* tumas ohel, so NJs are not included. NJs only have tumas
> mago (and I suppose maso). Do you have a source that would indicate
> otherwise?

Honestly, it was a gut reaction. I kind of vaguely recall that pose'a 'al 
qever nochri is tame. However, I haven't looked at this in ages and may be 
wrong.
-- 
Arie Folger
http://www.ariefolger.googlepages.com