[Avodah] Clarification on Hareidi El-Al
David Riceman
driceman at worldnet.att.net
Fri Jan 12 13:03:02 PST 2007
From: "Akiva Blum" <ydamyb at actcom.net.il>
> Tumah above *is* tumas ohel, so NJs are not included. NJs only have tumas
> mago (and > I suppose maso). Do you have a source that would indicate
> otherwise?
This is actually a three way machloketh. According to the Yereim (dead)
non-Jews do not have tumas meis; you have cited the opinion of the Rambam;
and according to the Baalei HaTosafos dead non-Jews do have tumas ohel. See
AH HeAsid H. Tumas Meis 3:12, and see the Mekoroth V'Tziyunim in Frankel's
edition of the Rambam H. Tumas Meis 1:12-13.
If I understand him correctly the Shulhan Arukh (YD 372:2) holds that ikkar
hadin is like the Rambam but that we should be mahmir like tosafos, and the
Rama is unsure which opinion is ikkar hadin.
For the particular case of cohanim see Pithchei Tshuva ad. loc. for
additional reasons to be lenient, and see Rabbi Feinstein's tshuva (which
I'm sure someone here can locate) for even more reasons for leniency in the
case of cohanim riding in airplanes. Perhaps some cohanim on the list can
tell us what the common practice is.
Incidentally I've been trying to understand someone's hava amina that people
buried in New Jersey are not metamei beohel. The best I can come up with is
that dying in New Jersey is such a horrible onesh that it's mechaper, and
the poster held that tzaddikim einam metamim.
David Riceman
More information about the Avodah
mailing list