[Avodah] (Neviim & Possible Mistakes); Akeidah & Yizchak

[Yitzchok Zirkind]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:27 AM, hankman <salman at videotron.ca> wrote:

>  Any proof to your reading of the Rambam?
>

I think it is Poshut.  My Hechrech is if there is times that they don't
understand part or all of a Nvuoh, how come the Rambam does not write so
Mfurosh, that would be the screaming difference between Moshe and others.


>  Bemechilas kvodcha, that is not how I understood the Rambam. The novi
> understands that which Hashem wishes him to understand and relates that
> which hashem tells him to relate, not just based on the novi's assumption of
> what is for publication. Part of my reasoning is that it would be hard to be
> mechayav the novi for kovesh nevuoso when he is the determinant (on his own)
> of what is for publication, as opposed to there being a tsivui (part of the
> nevuoh) to the novi as to what exactly to publish.
>

I don't get it, Kovesh Nvuosoi is Chayov Misah Byidei Shomayum (Rambam 9:2).
Klapei Shmayo Galya.

>
>
> RYZ wrote:
> if the lack of Pisron is what defines what part the
> Novi relates. in that case a Nvius without a given Pisron means it need
> not be said, and the Novie cannot be called Kovesh Nvuosoi, so why did the
> Novi give it over?
>
> CM responds:
> No, lack of pisron is not what defines what the novi relates.
>

So if a Novi has to relate even a Moshol w/o a Pisron, so what does define
what the Novi relates


>  Again, the novi can receive moshol or moshol with its pisron or a
> combination of both within one mareh nevuoh which also makes clear which
> parts of the mareh are for publication. Thus the Rambam concludes with his 3
> possible cases of what gets published.
>

Again nowhere does the  Rambam say that at times he doesn't understand it or
a part of it.

Kol Tuv,
Yitzchok Zirkind
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20090611/7b44ca24/attachment-0002.htm>