[Avodah] (Neviim & Possible Mistakes); Akeidah & Yizchak

[hankman]

RYZ wrote:
Proof? The Ramabam seems to say that the Novie always understands the
Pisron, no where does the Rambam say that the reason he relates one or the
other or both is because that is all he got, he seems to say IMHO that the
Novi understands what is meant to be said and what not (not based at all on
what he was shown, the wording in the Rambam LAN"D does not support this,
rather as I argue that he always gets a Pisron)

CM responds:
Any proof to your reading of the Rambam? Bemechilas kvodcha, that is not how I understood the Rambam. The novi understands that which Hashem wishes him to understand and relates that which hashem tells him to relate, not just based on the novi's assumption of what is for publication. Part of my reasoning is that it would be hard to be mechayav the novi for kovesh nevuoso when he is the determinant (on his own) of what is for publication, as opposed to there being a tsivui (part of the nevuoh) to the novi as to what exactly to publish.

RYZ wrote:
if the lack of Pisron is what defines what part the
Novi relates. in that case a Nvius without a given Pisron means it need
not be said, and the Novie cannot be called Kovesh Nvuosoi, so why did the
Novi give it over?

CM responds:
No, lack of pisron is not what defines what the novi relates. Again, the novi can receive moshol or moshol with its pisron or a combination of both within one mareh nevuoh which also makes clear which parts of the mareh are for publication. Thus the Rambam concludes with his 3 possible cases of what gets published.

Kol Tuv

Chaim Manaster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20090610/62d93a58/attachment-0001.htm>