[Avodah] (Neviim & Possible Mistakes); Akeidah & Yizchak

[Yitzchok Zirkind]

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM, hankman <salman at videotron.ca> wrote:

>  This must be the case. In fact one must say that part and parcel of the
> message (understood part of the nevuoh)  must always be which part of the
> nevuoh is intended for repetition to others, otherwise the novi who for
> example tells others only the moshol but not the pisron (assuming he himself
> has the pisron) would be over the issur of kovesh nevuoso.
>
>
The Rambam  in Halacha 3 begins by saying that the revelation to the Novie
is Derech Mashal uMiyad Yechokeik Bliboi Pisron...he concludes Yesh Sheim
Omrim Moshol Pisron or both, I don't see here that when the Moshol itself is
said that it is because the meaning was not revealed to him.

I think such a big  difference that would come from Aspaklaryoh Sheina
Meiroh would have been said Mfurosh both here (and in Halacha 6) and in
Hakdama to Chelek,  II would tend to think that the Novie understands what
is meant to him to relate Moshol Pisron or both, Koveish Nvuosoi is when he
says nothing (or not saying the Pisron or both when that was the intention
of HKB"H).

Further according to your reasoning a Novie that was Kovesh a Nvuoh witout a
Pisron would not be Over.  Also all nvous that were given witout Pisron
would have to be from such a class,  and they could have not been said?!

Gut Shabbos, v'Kol Tuv,
Yitzchok Zirkind
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20090605/7b1ffaf8/attachment-0002.htm>