[Avodah] childbirth
T613K at aol.com
T613K at aol.com
Sun Nov 9 00:29:31 PST 2008
From: "Chana Luntz" _Chana at kolsassoon.org.uk_
(mailto:Chana at kolsassoon.org.uk)
[Quoting RMF's teshuva:]
> because childbirth in its natural time in the natural way is not
> considered a danger at all. Since G-d created the world to be fruitful
> and multiply, there is no question that he created it that it should
> be for beracha and not for danger. Furthermore He commanded the
> obligation to have children. It is not logical that there would be a
> command to place one's self in danger in order to fulfil the mitzva of
> having children. .... We
> must conclude that there is absolutely no danger in childbirth at all.
> That mean that G-d promised that there would never be danger in
> childbirth.
>>That seems pretty clear cut and unequivocal. The logic makes sense. The
only problem is a) the statistics don't bear him out, as RTK brings (as well
as RET's anecdotal references to righteous women); and b) the halacha states
flatly that this is not the case, and that a woman in childbirth is to be
considered a chola sheyesh bo sakana and shabbas must be violated. <<
>>>>
I would like to suggest a possible [partial] reconciliation of RMF's
problematic teshuva with reality. And that is, /normal/ childbirth is not dangerous
in and of itself. If nothing goes wrong -- and the vast majority of times,
nothing does go wrong -- then childbirth is not intrinsically dangerous. In
the countries with the worst statistics (mentioned in that Time article I
referenced a few days ago), transportation is so bad and the countries are so
messed up that a third of all women give birth with /no/ assistance, not even a
midwife, and it is among those women that you find the highest mortality
rates. The Jewish women in Egypt were /unusual/ in not requiring the assistance
of midwives. (Some meforshim explain "chayos heima" as meaning that they
gave birth like animals, quickly and easily.) But a normal birth /with/ the
help of a midwife is usually not dangerous. What you might compare it to is
driving a car -- a normal everyday activity that has a certain level of risk
associated with it, but a risk that we consider so "normal" that nobody would
say, "Oy, are you out of your mind, doing something so risky, driving a car?!"
We would still have to take RMF's words "no danger in childbirth at all" as
guzma, rhetorical, not exactly literal but still normative. By normative I
mean, a Jew is generally not allowed to put his life at risk, but getting
pregnant is a normal, healthy thing to do and not to be thought of as a
suicidal career choice. The failure to use contraceptives is not the equivalent of
flying on a trapeze without a net.
--Toby Katz
=============
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20081109/78553b0e/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Avodah
mailing list