<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div style="height: auto;" dir="auto">the publisher would be first in line to tell you that this <i>seifer</i> is not entirely based on Heidenheim>></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Absolutely true</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">BUT</div><div dir="auto">In my experience he is usually close to RWH</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This specific deviation was a bit of a surprise to me</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">There are other cases where RWH might be more controversial. But afaict not this one</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">FWIW, I did confim this morning with 1 of my Roedelheim Humashim that RWH Has a revia.</div><div dir="auto"></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div id="composer_signature" dir="auto"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">RRW</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>