<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><div>On Aug 20, 2021, at 17:25, Akiva Miller via Mesorah <mesorah@lists.aishdas.org> wrote:</div><div><br></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto">The usual rule for two consecutive shvas is that the first is nach and the second is na. (Example: nifl'osecha in Modim)<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What about when there are three? I don't know if it ever happens in Hebrew, but I just found an example in Aramaic: </div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>I heard a lecture a few years ago by a professor at Oxford who mentioned that some בן נחמן manuscripts have a few triple shvas. I have no idea how they would be pronounced.<div><br></div><div>Zuki<br><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="font-size: 13pt;">-- </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Yitzchak M. Gottlieb</span></div><div>zukigottlieb@gmail.com</div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">Onkelos' translation of v'laalmana in Devarim 24:19. Shvas are on the resh, mem, and lamed. My first guess was to read them nach na na: ul-ar-m-l-ta. But then I realized it could also be nach nach na: ul-arm-l-ta.</blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Just wondering if anyone more familiar with Aramaic wants to offer their ideas. (And by the way, no puns intended if anyone thinks there's any Breslover influence on how I phrased this. Not that there's anything wrong with that.)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Akiva Miller</div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Mesorah mailing list</span><br><span>Mesorah@lists.aishdas.org</span><br><span>http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org</span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>