<html>
<body>
At 01:49 PM 2/27/2015, Michael Poppers wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">A <i>tipcha</i> immediately
prior to higher-level-<i>mafsiq</i> <i>sof-pasuq</i>/<i>silluq</i> is
close to being a <i>m'shareis</i></blockquote><br>
I thought that was the case only when the entire second part of the pasuk
(meaning, everything after the esnachta) consisted of only two
words.<br><br>
-- Sholom<br><br>
<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""> (not in re to elision of a
<i>dageish qal</i>, but in re to a possible understanding of the phrase);
another example of many can be found in next week's <i>sedra</i> (also
the <i>ta'anis-tzibbur</i> reading), "<i>vayiqra v'sheim
H'</i>" -- many commentators apparently take the trop strictly in
considering H' the subject (see ibn Ezra, RaShBaM, and S'forno), while
RaShY, quoting Targum, considers MRAH the subject (which would certainly
be the most-likely <i>p'shat</i> if the word was
"<i>b'sheim</i>", as it would be if the <i>tipcha</i> was on
"<i>vayiqra</i>"). As an exercise, look through last
week's and this week's readings for <i>s'michus</i> phrases that span a
<i>tipcha</i>....<br><br>
A gut'n Shabbes/Shabbas Shalom<br>
and all the best from<br>
<font face="trebuchet ms" color="#9900FF"><i>Michael Poppers</i></font> *
<font face="georgia">Elizabeth, NJ, USA<br>
</font><br>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Sholom Simon via Mesorah
<<a href="mailto:mesorah@lists.aishdas.org">
mesorah@lists.aishdas.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>In the first pasuk of Tetzavah (Shemos 27:20), the last three words
talk about lighting the ner tamid (27:20). The Sifre
(Beha'alos'cha, 59) draws from that the common understanding, that the
ner should burn continuously.<br><br>
<dd>However, there is a tipcha under the word "ner."Â
Rashi seems to interpret the pasuk al pi the trop, as he says that the
verse means: to light the ner, continually (i.e., it must be lit every
night) -- although Rashi doesn't prove his assertion with trop, rather,
he gives other examples of Torah's use of the word
"tamid."<br><br>
<dd>Am I understanding this correctly? If so, does anyone have any
thoughts about this observation?<br><br>
<dd>Good shabbos!<br><br>
<dd>-- Sholom<br><br>
<dd>_______________________________________________<br>
<dd>Mesorah mailing list<br>
<dd><a href="mailto:Mesorah@lists.aishdas.org">
Mesorah@lists.aishdas.org</a><br>
<dd>
<a href="http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org</a><br><br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>