<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17080" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page WordSection1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-reply
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.WordSection1 {
page: WordSection1
}
</STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US vLink=purple link=blue bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I found one other (I wouldn't call it secondary)
source outside of the Allepo Codex with this same Messora:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Codex Lamed (mem) whose Messora
Gedola Rav M. Breuer published in 5751 (reissued by Reuven Mas 5762).
This Codex was written by, punctuated by and had the massoretic notes
written by one Shmuel Ben Yaacov, who also punctuated and wrote the Massora
of the Leningrad B19a codex. Its MG is greatly influenced by the Bavli
Massora. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>On Dvarim 31:21 it says </FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"Ki Timtzena" (Deut 31:21 ) Umtzena menucha (Ruth
1:9) kt' (ktuvin ken) b'alm' (b'alma). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The editor R Breuer references the parallel Allepo
MG in Dvarim. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The usage "be'alma" is a Bavli Messora term,
defined by Ofer in his book "Ha'Messora HaBavlit LaTorah Ekronoteha U'Dracheha"
(Magnes 5761) as meaning (in my words, not his) - this Massoretic note is not
limited to Tora/ or Neviim /or some sefer but applies to the whole Tanach.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I understand this Messora as specifying these 2
cases of the root M' Tz' A' ending with a nun with a kamatz - . <BR>Both
are plural feminine, if my dikduk is on the level. That's pretty similar to me,
better than an understood "be'lishana" which you have not infrequently in
the Messora....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Kol Tuv</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dov Bloom (DB the younger on this
list)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=HayyimObadyah@aol.com href="mailto:HayyimObadyah@aol.com">Hayyim
Obadyah</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=mesorah@lists.aishdas.org
href="mailto:mesorah@lists.aishdas.org">mesorah@lists.aishdas.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 31, 2010 8:18
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Mesorah] Allepo Codex -
Ruth 1:9</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=WordSection1>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">I’m sure you’re
right. They just didn’t seem similar enough.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">Can you suggest any
secondary source on the Aleppo Codex massora that is not in L?
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'">From:</SPAN></B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'"> Yisrael Dubitsky
[mailto:yidubitsky@gmail.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 31, 2010 12:02
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Hayyim Obadyah<BR><B>Cc:</B> <A
href="mailto:mesorah@lists.aishdas.org">mesorah@lists.aishdas.org</A><BR><B>Subject:</B>
Re: [Mesorah] Allepo Codex - Ruth 1:9<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt">Aleppo at Deut 31:21 has the
same note so clearly that is the second reference...Why would you discount
that?<o:p></o:p></P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal>On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Hayyim Obadyah <<A
href="mailto:HayyimObadyah@aol.com">HayyimObadyah@aol.com</A>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></P>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P>It looks to me that the Aleppo Codex gives a masora qetana not in the
Leningrad Codex for WMC)N <SPAN lang=HE dir=rtl
style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt">וּמְצֶ֣אןָ</SPAN><SPAN dir=ltr></SPAN><SPAN
dir=ltr></SPAN> of "beth haser (twice defective)". However, I find no
other occurrence of the word, with or without waw conjunctive, with or without
final heh (although TMC)N <SPAN lang=HE dir=rtl
style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt">תִמְצֶ֨אןָ</SPAN><SPAN dir=ltr></SPAN><SPAN
dir=ltr></SPAN>, also haser, occurs in Deut 31:21). I found nothing
listed for the word in Ginsburg's Massorah or Frensdorff's Massora Magna or
his Ochlah W’ochlah. <o:p></o:p></P>
<P> <o:p></o:p></P>
<P>Am I misreading the manuscript pdf?<o:p></o:p></P>
<P>Hayyim<o:p></o:p></P>
<P><SPAN style="COLOR: #888888"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="COLOR: #888888"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt"><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Mesorah
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:Mesorah@lists.aishdas.org">Mesorah@lists.aishdas.org</A><BR><A
href="http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org"
target=_blank>http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org</A><o:p></o:p></P></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>Mesorah mailing
list<BR>Mesorah@lists.aishdas.org<BR>http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>