[Mesorah] P. Metzora 14:6 Hash'chutah

[Akiva Miller]

R' Rich Wolpoe wrote <<< 3. Since The Masoretic text does not follow our
rules of Diqduq, there is no reason to expect a dagesh in that Tes  >>>

I'm having trouble with the clause "The Masoretic text does not follow our
rules of Diqduq". If I'm reading it correctly, then either the Masoretic
text is wrong, or our rules of Diqduq are wrong. Which?

I do realize that I'm probably opening quite a can of worms here. Have at
it!

Thanks!

Akiva Miller



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 6:42 PM rabbirichwolpoe via Mesorah <
mesorah at lists.aishdas.org> wrote:

>
> Hash'chutah is written AFAICT with the 3 dot "Qubutz" as opposed to the
> Shuruq with a vav
>
> The Teis has no dagesh Hazzaq.
>
> What is the best explanation for the lack ofbacdagesh in the Teis.
>
> 1.  We simply don't know
> 2.  Since shechuta usually has A Shuruq (vav) we read  it as if it were
> there.
> 3. Since The Masoretic text does not follow our rules of Diqduq, there is
> no reason to expect a dagesh in that Tes
> 4. Other?
>
>
>
> RRW
> _______________________________________________
> Mesorah mailing list
> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20190414/53fd50fb/attachment-0002.htm>