[Mesorah] Yaaleh ViYavo

R Davidovich raphaeldavidovich at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 18:47:26 PDT 2013


Offhand, Baal peh, no. 
It's only an issue in benching, not davening. 

Of course it's a far fetched concern. Until MB, almost unheard of - and until Artscroll took sides, almost totally not practiced. 



On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:39 PM, Yosef Skolnick <yskolnick at gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you happen to know where in MB?   Also, how did the word melech appear there in the first place?
> 
> Yosef Skolnick
> 516-690-SKOL
> https://sites.google.com/site/yskolnick/
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:33 PM, R Davidovich <raphaeldavidovich at gmail.com> wrote:
> The mishna Berura quotes an opinion that since the third Bracha of benching according to the Gemara Davka mentions "melech" three times, the mention of melech in Yaaleh viyavo should be omitted. Artscroll decided to incorporate that view in their hagados. 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Yosef Skolnick <yskolnick at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi-
>> 
>> We noticed over yomtov that the yaaleh viyavo has a phrase at the end saying "Ki Al (Melech) chanun virachum atah"  Through out all the of the siddurim that I have seen it has the word melech included, but in some versions of the hagaddah (non of the old copys of manuscripts though) they leave off the word melech.  Artscroll says that that line is from Nechemia, but the word melech is also missing from there. Any thoughts?
>> 
>> Yosef Skolnick
>> 516-690-SKOL
>> https://sites.google.com/site/yskolnick/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mesorah mailing list
>> Mesorah at lists.aishdas.org
>> http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/mesorah-aishdas.org
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20130330/b4021140/attachment-0006.htm>


More information about the Mesorah mailing list