[Mesorah] ham'chadesh, ham'vorach, ...

[Michael Poppers]

R'Micha wrote:
> dalet: under an os *D*egushah (e.g. dab'ru) <
To be more explicit, perhaps the rule should be:
D: under an os d'gushah which would be pronounced even if it didn't have a
dageish (to the exclusion of an eim haq'riyah [anyone say "haqriyah"? :)]
that is mappiq only because of its dageish).

All the best from
--Michael Poppers via RIM pager
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/mesorah-aishdas.org/attachments/20080529/278818dd/attachment-0009.htm>