<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif;" class="elementToProof">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
</span><span style="font-size: 14.6667px; color: rgb(36, 36, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">'To the best of my knowledge, Rav Moshe Mendelssohn himself was most</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
</span><span style="font-size: 14.6667px; color: rgb(36, 36, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">definitely Orthodox (although that term may be a bit anachronistic?), even</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
</span><span style="font-size: 14.6667px; color: rgb(36, 36, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">if his ideas later became important in the development of Reform. The view</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
</span><span style="font-size: 14.6667px; color: rgb(36, 36, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">that he himself was somehow Reform seems to be based primarily on ignorance.'</span></div>
<div style="font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(66, 66, 66);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(66, 66, 66);" class="elementToProof">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: "Segoe UI", "Segoe UI Web (West European)", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(66, 66, 66);" class="elementToProof">
Yes it is anachronistic to call Mendelson Orthodox or Reform, as neither term was yet in use. However he was certainly a trail blazer, and the trail he blazed lead straight to Reform within a generation. He was a traditionally trained talmid chacham and his
writings remained technically and halachically within the bounds of Torah thought. But in his thoughts about the relationship between being German and being Jewish , and his openly unreserved desire to embrace German culture, he paved an obvious path to the
deviances of Reform from derech haTorah, not only in hindsight but also in the view of some contemporaries. So perhaps viewing him as being proto-Reform is more accurate. I certainly see no need to accord him the honorific of Rabbi. The damage he wrought is
tremendous.</div>
</body>
</html>