<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1255"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/29/2016 12:24 AM, H Lampel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote><tt>Chagiga 3b:</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> "Ba'alei asufos" (Qoheles 12:11) ... "Kulam nitnu
miRo'eh echad." One G-d gave them, one</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> source/leader said them, miPi Adon kol hama'asim
barukh Hu. As it says (Shemos 20:1), "Vaydaber E-lokim es kol
hadevarim ha'eileh".</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>...</tt><tt>RASHI: You don't have any of the disputants
bringing a proof from any god's torah, only from the Torah of
our G-d.'' and he explains ''Parness echad amran''to mean: You
don't have anyone bringing a proof from the words of a prophet
who came to argue against Moshe Rabbeynu.''</tt><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote
cite="mid:25d7970c-289c-715d-e7c1-2a6f0fd961fd@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote><tt>''Since their hearts are [directed] to heaven
[i.e. since they are both making sincere attempts <i>to
understand the matter</i>]...learn and know the words of all
[the disp</tt><tt>utants], and when you will know to
distinguish which one is valid (u'k'sheh-taya lehavchin ay zeh
yikasher), establish the halacha accordingly.''</tt><br>
</blockquote>
<tt>Identical to the Ritva ...</tt><tt><br>
</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>Better: ''Since their hearts are [directed] to
heaven [i.e. since they are both making sincere attempts <i>to
understand Mos</i><i>he and Hashem's </i><i>Torah, no one
else's, this qualifies what they say as ''divrei
Elokim''--words/matters </i><i>concerning Has</i><i>hem</i><i>
and His Will, and not </i><i>concerning</i><i> any other
deity</i>]...learn and know the words of all [the disp</tt><tt>utants],
and when you will know to distinguish which one is valid
(u'k'sheh-taya lehavchin ay zeh yikasher), establish the halacha
accordingly.''<br>
<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt>Zvi Lampel</tt><br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>