<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I an extremely short review his main point is that in most areas the expert can never give a definitive answer. He can only supply statistics or in RMA words he provides a graph of the probability of outcomes as a function of either one
or many variables.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thus there are 3 steps in any psak. 1) derive the graph and statistics - this is the job of the expert<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2) decide what level of risk is acceptable - this is the job of the rabbi 3) deliver a psak based this analysis<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(1) can be disputed by anyone who has access to the full information and the appropriate knowledge<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(2) The rabbis opinion is just an opinion - exceptions to this rule are either a sanhedrin or when has accepted the rabbi for example in a local shul<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">------------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Much like the ~Ramban’s famous statement concerning no slam dun proofs s in halachic debate But what algorithm does a poseik use to determine the Boolean
result in your case or even in deciding between pure conceptual positions?<br>
KVCT<br>
Joel rich<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br><pre><font color="blue">
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE
ADDRESSEE. IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. Dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is
strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.
Thank you.
</font></pre><br>
</body>
</html>