<div dir="ltr">r slifkin here<div><br><div> [  <a href="http://www.rationalistjudaism.com/2016/07/strengthening-emunah-via-denying.html?utm_content=buffer35a29&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer">http://www.rationalistjudaism.com/2016/07/strengthening-emunah-via-denying.html?utm_content=buffer35a29&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer</a>  ]   </div><div><br></div><div>argues essentially that the teachers of emunah  are using invalid arguments.<div><br></div><div>is anybody writing / teaching with methods that are not assailable? </div><div>or is it that in a hermetically sealed environment these types of arguably flawed posits are sufficient? </div><div> is it even possible to teach in an irrefutable way , or will there always be a 'ta shma'  on any type of proofs one tries to bring?</div></div></div></div>