<div dir="ltr">Rn' Toby Katz wrote:<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">> Most Ashkenazi charedim in Israel do make a distinction between the</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">> pronunciation of street Hebrew and that used for davening or leining.</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">> They do distinguish between Ivrit and Loshon Hakodesh. They connect</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">> very well with tefilla and krias haTorah -- with an attitude of</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">> reverence and an understanding that a siddur or Chumash is not the same</span><br style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px">> as a newspaper.</span><br></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13.333333969116211px"><br></span></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">As I mentioned earlier, I'm conflicted about this issue, and there is a chance that if it would have been up to me :-), dati-le'umi Ashkenazim would be doing the same.</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">That being said. though, the contrast of this "havdala-emphasis" approach with the "integrated life" approach that I mentioned in my previous post brings to mind the underlying hashkafic issue. I'm going to change the subject entirely, but the Avodah forum seems like an appropriate place to explore the issue. While I identify with the dati-leumi community, I can only claim to speak for myself, and I am more interested in hearing an analysis of my worldview on its own merits than I am in whether or not it corresponds to any"official" dati-leumi "party line."</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">I remember that many years ago, the nuances of and distinctions between "Torah umadda" and "Torah im derech eretz" were discussed here extensively. My feeling is that these concepts, while very valuable for functioning in chutz la'aretz, are much less relevant in Israel. Much of the charedi community rejects these concepts between because Torah should be everything, and it shouldn't be "Torah and..." or "Torah with..." I fundamentally agree with this point. The difference is that my view of a Torah-based lifestyle includes the inherent value of learning about the world (so-called "secular" studies), room for cultural expression (including appreciation of the cultural contributions of other nations, when they don't contradict Torah values), and even a fair dose of "Western" liberal values. The "integrated life" means that we don't need to feel that we are dual citizens, shuttling back and forth between two worlds.</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">Yes, there are dangers in this blurring of the boundaries between kodesh and chol. I do not want my children thinking that a siddur or chumash is the same as a newspaper. But I would like them to feel that reading a newspaper can be a natural part of the day, just like reading a siddur or chumash is, and that it does not entail temporarily taking off one's Torah Jew (metaphorical) hat and switching to a *different* "informed citizen of the world" hat. (One cannot help but note the contrast with Rav Hirsch's Realschule, where the talmidim literally took off their hats when switching to limudei chol... I'm not saying this to be critical. Frankfurt of the 5620s is very different from Jerualem of the 5770s.)</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">As an aside, since I realize that that decades are not often referenced the way that I referenced them above, I will point out that it is this same outlook that leads me to feel strongly about use of the Hebrew calendar in everyday life. I have a hard time with the idea that yamim tovim and yahrzeits are "religious" things that we observe on one calendar, but birthdays and business meetings are "secular" things for which we use an entirely different calendar. In chu"l, that is simply how it is, because the surrounding society is not Jewish, and there is no reason for them to be using the Hebrew calendar. But in Israel, where there is already partial "everyday" use of the Hebrew calendar (it appears on all official documents, you can write it on your checks, it determines all school vacations except the summer, etc.), striving for its more widespread everyday use is a reasonable goal. </font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">I acknowledge that the reality, even in Israel, is that there are times that one needs to separate oneself from the surrounding general culture. But at the same time, one can also seek to influence that culture and bring it closer to being the integrated Torah culture that is the ideal. If we were to assume that the "ideal" culture involves *only* shiurei Torah, then the idea of helping to shape a general culture is a non-starter, since it is obvious that general culture will never give up the theater, and so all that is left for us to do is to view ourselves as "outsiders" from that culture. But if we assume that a full, healthy culture -- even in a society consisting entirely of shomrei mitzvos -- ought to include the theater, then the goal of helping to make that theater reflect our values becomes worthwhile.</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">-- D.C.</font></div></div>