<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>RMGR wrote:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">And if the beast is not<BR>Shechted properly,
some maintain that it is kosher nonetheless. If we argue<BR>that the Ben Pekuah
is Parev, there is no indication that our Sages decreed<BR>that out should be
treated as though it is meaty.</FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>CM notes:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>AFAIK a ben pakua (min haTorah) is basically MEAT that is already shechted
(even though it is living) with the shechita of its mother. But nowhere is there
a claim that the BP has lost its status as meat – it is merely meat that it has
already satisfied the requirements of shechita. So no way is it parev (so far as
I know). I will beli neder try to do a search in the achronim to see if I can
find anything different.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Kol tuv</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Chaim Manaster</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>