<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR><BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">On 15/06/2012 2:07 PM, hankman wrote:<BR>> So just
which “nevuah is decidedly new” and unknown or not revealed to <BR>> Moshe
Rabbeinu? Is it the ma’assei merkovo (but ma sheroaso shifcha al <BR>> hayam
...) or the nevuas Yeshai’ahu on Gog uMogog or kibbutz Golios etc. <BR>> Just
what would you point to as decicedly new and unknown to MR or that <BR>> adds
new revelations unknown to MR the av hanevi’im? Don’t give me a <BR>>
generality, but point to a specific nevuah in Nach of the type of which <BR>>
you speak and also tell me how you know MR did not know it.<BR><BR>RZS
responded:<BR>Well, all of Nach. And every nevuah that didn't make it into
Nach<BR>because it had no lesson for klal yisrael. None of them were
known<BR>before they were given. So they're all new. But none of them
change<BR>the halacha.<BR><BR>CM responds:<BR>I knew you would respond with this
generality which is why I asked you to be <BR>specific and to tell us how you
know that MR didn't have this revealed to <BR>him. So once again, please
restrict your answer to one specific nevuah in <BR>Nach that is mechadesh Torah
secrets to which MR was not privy and how you <BR>know that is the
case.<BR><BR>Kol tuv<BR>Chaim Manaster</FONT><BR><BR></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>