<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
what exactly is the issur of pre-marital sex if the nidda issue is
resolved by allowing single women to use the mikva?<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">---------
</pre>
<br>
On 25/10/2011 5:08 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Saul.Z.Newman@kp.org">Saul.Z.Newman@kp.org</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:OF4E5C8263.862BA197-ON88257934.0052F595-88257934.0053335A@kp.org"
type="cite">
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4135447,00.html"><font
color="blue" size="3"><u>http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4135447,00.html</u></font></a><font
size="3">
</font>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif" size="2">1. who should control who is
allowed
to toivel?</font>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif" size="2">2. would it be better to allow
mikva use t remove nidda issues even if other issurim
will transpire as a result ?</font>
<br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif" size="2">[is the answer to no 1 somewhat
different , since the mikva is a publicly paid-for institution?
}</font>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>