<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div>why does Hashem say regarding the battle with amalek, that His throne will</div><div>not be complete, until "amalek" is destroyed?</div><div>2 questions: what does amalek represent (so reprehensibly) that Hashem's</div><div>throne won't be complete??</div><div>weren't/aren't there more depraved, evil, etc, people(s) on the earth that have</div><div>existed, that "quote/unqote" been in existence, stood against Hashem's glory <br></div><div>and his teachings??? <br></div><div>Why davka Amalek??</div><div>2. do we hold that the battle of amalek is both a physical one (as well as a <br></div><div>spiritual one?? or is one (you choose the one) sufficient a battle to engage in??</div><div>2a. some hold that amalek = doubt, or sowing the seeds of doubt (eg in a <br></div><div>rational or philosophical way), but wouldn't that be more in the
realm of "greek"</div><div>philosopy?? where nothing, to a degree of 100% certainty (eg, our reality, <br></div><div>torah's validity given that we weren't there, other philosophical constructs including</div><div>the validity of math, reason, logic, euclidean geometry (basic building blocks <br></div><div>of western societies' thinking, etc) can ever be proven..............<br></div></div></body></html>