<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:44, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Saul.Z.Newman@kp.org">Saul.Z.Newman@kp.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><font face="sans-serif" size="2">have seen in MO synagogues
, usually by mincha of shabbos zachor , a second
'layning' of zachor for those who missed. is
one yotze with this---with no bracha before and after?<br>
</font><br></blockquote></div><br>Your assumption is that this needs a bracha to begin with. <br>I am posting the last 2 paragraphs of RSM's thoughts on Zachor. See here for the entire post <a href="http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/vol06/v06n153.shtml#17">http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/vol06/v06n153.shtml#17</a><br>
<pre><font style="font-family: times new roman,serif;" size="2"><font size="2">If you still want to go against all the rishonim and say that this<br>g'moro is indeed lahalokho, I encourage you to get a minyan together<br>
every shabbos to lein zakhor es yom hashabbos, and maybe on Miryam's<br>yohrtzeit to lein about her zakhor, and also for mon,<br><br>And, to end with the plaintive wail of a CQ: even according to this<br>modern idea that parshas Zakhor is d'orayso because purported you are<br>
m'qayyem some mitzva of z'khiras 'Amoleq, why, oh why, should that<br>require you to take any more care in leining it than any other part of<br>the Torah? Adrabbo, for sure mitzvas z'khiras 'Amoleq does not require<br>
you to recite the posuq word for word in Hebrew.<br><br>Curmudgeonly yours,<br>Seth Mandel</font><br><br></font></pre>