<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:01 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com">rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
The Both Ben Ish Chay and Kaf Hachayyim state this in several places - that bimqom minhag, s'feiq brachos l'haqeil does NOT apply. And those Pos'qim are quite tolerant of the Ashk'nazic position.<br>
<br>
HOWEVER, those S'phardim who protest Ashk'nazim for brachah on Hallel b'dilug, or for women benching lulav etc. Would lich'ora reject that position. And it is to those "kitzonim" that I had addressed my question.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>I had Hallel bedillug in mind when I added the qualification "at least when there is no specific ruling against the beracha in the SA", and the same would apply to women's berachot on MASG. See <a href="http://www.toratemetfreeware.com/kitsur_yalkut_yossef.htm#HtmpReportNum0670">http://www.toratemetfreeware.com/kitsur_yalkut_yossef.htm#HtmpReportNum0670</a> for ROY's position on the latter (a huge page, containing the whole of Yalkut Yosef OH, so it will may take some time to load)<br>
</div></div><br></div>