<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>--- On <B>Wed, 12/9/09, Saul.Z.Newman@kp.org <I><Saul.Z.Newman@kp.org></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1463567408><FONT face=sans-serif size=2><A href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/morethodoxy/item/the_ever-narrowing_orthodox_mind_39091208/">http://www.jewishjournal.com/morethodoxy/item/the_ever-narrowing_orthodox_mind_39091208/</A></FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>one of the leaders of the new liberal O branch , lists a few exemplary issues of dogma , that people to the right in O might have trouble with.</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>i wonder if anyone wants to take a stab at whether any of these issues would be deemed not compatible with O ... maybe the efficacy of prayer in a non-O setting?</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>------------------------------------</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I think they have a point. Are all the dogmas they list imperitives for O Jews? Or can one be an O Jew without accepting one or more of them? I think the latter is true. The question is whether the RW thinks so or not.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>HM<BR><BR>Want Emes and Emunah in your life? <BR><BR>Try this: http://haemtza.blogspot.com/<BR><BR></DIV></td></tr></table><br>