<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Rich, Joel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:JRich@sibson.com">JRich@sibson.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
But that requires a determination that the person actually does pose such a threat, not merely that he has been convicted of a crime which has been put into a category of "crimes that affect public safety". Labels don't change reality. </div>
</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"> </div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">
--<br>
Zev Sero<br>
</div>=====================<br>
Actually, depending on one's understanding of DMD, I would say they do - i.e. if the King decides it is, it may well be.<br>
KT<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>According to you, when would you have a legitimate case of Pidyon Shevuim?</div><div><br></div><div>It would seem clear throughout history (at least anecdotally) that many of the leaders of the jewish people have not taken this approach. The stories that float around of this rabbi going to seek the release of X prisoner or that rabbi seeking a stay of execution of Y prisoner. </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote></div>