<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=windows-1255 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7100.4137"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>R'nTK wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>I have already indicated that I don't believe you are defining EvE
<BR>correctly. I define it as "both have sources, both have reason, both
have merit" <BR>-- but not "both are true."<BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>CM:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>You say "but not 'both are true.'" If not true,
then it must be false (I see no middle ground between true and false, like maybe
true, possibly true, partially true, good sources but ultimately false, with
reason but ultimately false). SO I have difficulty with your position that EvE
will accept something as false nevertheless assign it merit. What is
the nature of the merit of a falsehood? I prefer the paradox of "Schrodinger's
Mamzer." At least it does no harm to foundational concepts of emes. Also it is a
paradox I may not understand but must live anyway with if I accept the veracity
of quantum mechanics (at least with this interpretation).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Kol Tuv</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Chaim Manaster</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>