<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1634" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The question of YT Sheni is simply one of many that
is going to have to be decided upon when the BM is rebuilt. Is everyone outside
of the Miqdash going to give up shaking the lulav after YT? If there was a BM
now, then would no one shake a lulav this year except for those on the
BM? I have no idea what is going to happen. Maybe the Sanhedrin will decide
to keep the galut rules in place, thinking that the change would cause problems
which are simply too serious (irrespective of Reform Jewry).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ben</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com
href="mailto:rabbirichwolpoe@gmail.com">Richard Wolpoe</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">Passsword protected websites </DIV>I'm not
against YT Sheini. The idea that we have always done it that way doesn't cut
it when the circumstances have radically changed<BR><BR>The SA said without
orchim in shuls, better NOT TO say Qiddush even though Ran says to say it even
w/o orchim. Most shtiebels follow this change! <BR> <BR>This is not
about Reform, this about investigation and svara.<BR>If you want to say let's
KEEP YT Sheini - Davka lehotzi mileiv hareformers Fine! so it is
now a taqqama to discredit Reform. That has some logic to
it.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>