<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Ben Waxman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ben1456@zahav.net.il">ben1456@zahav.net.il</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Or think about how easy it would be to send out
incorrect messages, get an email rumor started, make a false web<i> </i>site,
etc.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div><font color="#888888">
<div><font face="Arial"><font size="2">Ben</font></font></div></font></div></blockquote></div><br><ul><li>There is no foolproof system</li><li>The cheshash is 1% of the concern for dishonest witnesses etc. as documented in the Talmud itself.</li>
<li>It could be broadcast on satelite TV etc.</li><li>Phone sqauds could be set up</li><li>Passsword protected websites </li></ul>I'm not against YT Sheini. The idea that we have always done it that way doesn't cut it when the circumstances have radically changed<br>
<br>The SA said without orchim in shuls, better NOT TO say Qiddush even though Ran says to say it even w/o orchim. Most shtiebels follow this change! <br> <br>This is not about Reform, this about investigation and svara.<br>
If you want to say let's KEEP YT Sheini - Davka lehotzi mileiv hareformers Fine! so it is now a taqqama to discredit Reform. That has some logic to it.<br><br><br><br>--<br> <br>Shana Tova - A Good New Year 5770 <br>
RabbiRichWolpoe@Gmail.com<br>see: <a href="http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/">http://nishmablog.blogspot.com/</a><br><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nishma-Minhag/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nishma-Minhag/</a><br>
<br>