<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16809" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><BR></FONT><BR> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV><SPAN class=Apple-style-span
style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse">Re:the quote from RHS of zniut<BR>This essay
reflects a methodological approach of RHS that I have seen in other contexts
tghat, BMKVT i find problematic - the use of a legitimate source, that argues
a position that supports his desired conclusion - but that the original
position cited is in general ignored (or minimized) in practice. (eg, in
talking about women's tefillot, the Magen Avraham's position about women
reading kriat hatorah)<BR></SPAN><SPAN class=Apple-style-span
style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse"><FONT color=#888888>
<DIV><BR>Meir Shinnar</FONT><SPAN class=429230919-10072009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff> </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=429230919-10072009></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=429230919-10072009><FONT
color=#888888>==============</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=429230919-10072009><FONT color=#888888>IIUC R'HS would say
that we should follow the original
position/practice </FONT> </SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=429230919-10072009><FONT color=#888888>KT<BR>Joel
Rich</FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br><table bgcolor=white style="color:black"><tr><td><br>THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE <br>
ADDRESSEE. IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL <br>
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. Dissemination, <br>
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is <br>
strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us <br>
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message. <br>
Thank you.<br>
</td></tr></table></BODY></HTML>